Stephen Gutowski of the Washington Free Beacon has reported on the legislation and appeared on NRATV's Cam and Company to talk more about the Governor's proposed gun confiscation plan. He said the Governor's office will not return his calls to answer questions of how they plan to enforce this if the bill passed.
Rest assured that the VSSA legislative team is working to defeat this an all of the gun ban legislation that has been introduced in the legislature. This bill should be a wake up call to all Virginia gun owners. If we don't get involved in this year's elections, this is the type of legislation that could pass in 2020.
New Bureau of Justice Statistics Report Confirms Small Number of Criminals Get Guns Through Retailers
Overall, an estimated 287,400 prisoners possessed a firearm during their offense. Among prisoners who possessed a gun during their offense, 90% did not obtain it from a retail source. More than half (56%) of prisoners who possessed a firearm during their offense had either stolen it (6%), found it at the scene of the crime (7%), or obtained it off the street or from the underground market (43%). Fewer than 1% had obtained the firearm at a gun show (0.8%).These numbers are similar to other BJS studies of prisoners. Now it is possible that after the background check was instituted in 1993 that criminals turned to other sources other than retailers for their guns but those looking to say there is a gaping "loophole" at gun shows where private sales are not required to under go background checks can take no solace from this report. Less than 1% of the prisoners went to gun shows to get their guns.
Duke University public policy expert Philip Cook did tell the Crime report that it is possible that as state that dedicates resources to enforcing "universal" background checks will have good results but added not all programs are going to be equally effective.
We've already seen in states like Colorado that have "universal" background checks that even when a state dedicates large resources, much of that appropriation goes unused, mostly because the projected surge in background checks never materializes, either due to non-compliance, or more likely, the number of privates sales has always been overstated.
Either way, we have confirmation from the new BJS story that "universal" background checks will not reduce crime.
As that response pointed out, according to FBI Uniform Crime Report data, rifles of all kinds are used in a small percentage of firearm related homicides which means specific types of rifles like AR-15s are used in even less. But that doesn't matter to the gun ban crowd. They throw around terms like "military style" to make the general public think that firearms used by the military are for sale to civilians. They all speak from talking points given to them by the gun ban lobby.
Senator Warner was never a 2nd Amendment supporter. He simply used a strategy devised by Democratic Strategist Dave "Mudcat" Saunders, to get elected Governor in 2001, and continued to groom that persona while Governor. It is true Warner signed a number of pro-gun bills during that time but it should also be noted that he worked hard behind the scenes to keep a full repeal of Virginia's "one gun-a-month" law from passing. He would only sign a bill that allowed concealed handgun permit (CHP) holders to buy more than one handgun in a 30 day period. Before running for Governor, Warner had supported a ban on modern sporting rifles (1996) and three years before that he supported a five day waiting period to purchase a handgun (1993). I wonder what Saunders thinks about the Mark Warner of today from what he sold voters in 2001.
You can catch the latest 2nd Amendment news from Cam on NRATV's Cam and Company every weekday at 5:30 or anytime on demand.
Among the bills in the sweeping proposal is one which the governor said, according to his announcement, “modifies the definition of assault firearm to any firearm that is equipped with a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds of ammunition.”
Northam’s proposal would “ban the sale, purchase, possession, and transport of assault firearms in the Commonwealth,” according to the announcement.
The measure is not the same as a magazine capacity restriction, which bans possession of the magazines themselves, depending on capacity. Similar magazine bans were introduced by lawmakers in previous years, and may resurface in 2019.
Detachable magazines are interchangeable on semiautomatic firearms. Consequently, any firearm which accepts detachable magazines is equipped to fire more than 10 rounds in a detachable magazine of varying size, and would be banned.
Detachable magazines are used in common firearms, from the AR-15 to the 10/22, the common .22 rifle used by scouting groups and other youth, which even comes in an edition officially licensed by the Boy Scouts of America.Also note that Northam's bill would ban not only the sale, but also the possession of, so-called "assault rifles" in the Commonwealth. This means that the Governor would expect the hundreds of thousands of Virginians that own the rifles to turn them in. Lt. Governor Justin Fairfax campaigned on a platform to confiscate firearms in 2017 so it would not be out of the whelm of possibility for the Governor to pick up that mantle.
In related news, VSSA Life Member and Second Amendment attorney Steve Halbrook told Dana Loesch yesterday that Governor Northam's gun ban proposals are just one more step of trying to "Californacate" Virginia.
If this is not enough to prove that the 2019 General Assembly elections will determine if Virginia's gun owners begin to face what California and New Jersey gun owners already face, nothing will.
Included in the package of seven bills is a so-called "universal background check" bill with the goal of prohibiting the private sale of firearms, firearm confiscation without due process via so-called "red flag law", reinstate Virginia’s handgun rationing law, prohibit individuals subject to final protective orders from possessing firearms; ban modern sporting rifles; prevent children from accessing firearms; and require individuals to report lost or stolen firearms to law enforcement. All of these proposals have failed in the past. But Virginia's once strong pro-rights majority in the House of Delegates is down to a one member majority with the same in the State Senate. It is not certain if Republicans will remain unified in opposing the "red flag" bill. A similar measure was passed by the Republican majority legislature in Florida and signed by Republican Governor Rick Scott after the Parkland school shooting. The 2019 General Assembly gavels into session on Wednesday January 9th.
Determined to address gun violence from within the firearms industry, the Episcopal Diocese of Western Massachusetts voted last week to buy 200 shares of stock in American Outdoor Brands, the Springfield-based parent company of Smith & Wesson.
“So that we might have a voice at the table and work with some other church groups to see what we can do to lessen the public health crisis of gun violence,” said Bishop Douglas J. Fisher. “It’s born out of frustration.”
Two hundred shares is the minimum number needed to place an initiative question on the ballot before shareholders at American Outdoor Brands' annual meeting.You may recall that last year a group of nuns was successful in pushing through a shareholder ballot initiative forcing Smith and Wesson to to "give an accounting of how the company monitors gun violence and what it's doing to make safer products and keep firearms away from those who shouldn't own them." It appears Smith and Wesson might want to consider increasing the minimum number of shares required to put a question on the ballot at a stockholder meeting. At the current price of American Outdoor Brands (Smith and Wesson's holding company) that amounts to only having to fork over $2600 in order to create mischief. These people aren't interested in protecting an investment, they want to harm the company and by extension, gun owners.